FORMS OF MARRIAGES

 


The dharma sastras, including the Manusmrti, mention eight forms of marriage Brahmo-daivastathaivarsah prajapatya-statha ‘surah Guandao hiraksasascaiva Paisavastamah smrtah -Manusmrti, 3. 21 The eight types are: brahma, daiva, arsa, prajapatya, asura, gandharva, rakshasa and paisachika.

 

BRAHMA MARRIAGE

    Brahma marriage refers to the marriage when bride’s father himself invites a man as groom, who is endowed with learning and character and decides to give his daughter to him, this is called Brahma  marriage.  Before  giving  away  his  daughter,  she  is suitably dressed (preferably with some ornaments), he worships the couple (bride and groom).

This type of marriage is defined in Manu Smriti (Verse 3.27)

Ācchādya cārcayitvā ca śrutaśīlavate  svayam  | 

Ahuja dānaṃ kanyāyā brāhmo dharmaḥ prakīrtitaḥ ||

DESCRIPTION

Confarreatio marriage practiced in the ancient Rome also resemble the Brahma form of  marriage,  Manu  (Latin:  manʊs’)  and  Yajnavalkya  (Sanskrit:  ज्ल्,  Yājñavalkya). This form of marriage held that the son born of a marriage redeems form  sins of ten ancestors, ten descendants and himself. In the Mahabharata, it is found that the Kshatriyas practiced the Brahma form of marriage, although as suggested by its name, it was mostly practiced by Brahmins.

In this form of marriage social decency was maintained to full extent and the religious rites were observed to the extent possible. It also implies an advanced stage of social progress as the form of marriage appears to have been intended as a reward for learning in the Hindu scriptures and thought to be an impelling force for the study of the Vedas.

This type of marriage has the supreme position and most prevalent type of marriage within Hindu society within the eight types according to the ancient Indian scriptures like Manu Smriti, Mahabharata and Veda, etc., and as specifically mentioned in Manu Smriti (Verse 3.21)

 

Brāhmo daivastathaivārṣaḥ prājāpatyastathā’suraḥ | 

Gāndharvo rākṣasaścaiva paiśācaścāṣṭamo’dhamaḥ ||

 DAIVA MARRIAGE

Daiva marriage is the marriage, when the parents of the girl start looking for a suitable match for their daughter immediately after she attains puberty. Their priority is to get her married off at the earliest. But in case they fail to find and fix her marriage within a reasonable time to a suitable groom of their choice, they decide to offer the girl as Dakshina to a priest, which is called Daiva marriage. No qualities of groom like good character, conduct, etc. are emphasized in this form of marriage. Typically, this type of marriage literally amounts to giving away the bride to the priest, at times due to inability of her family to organise her, being poor.

 This type of marriage has been defined in Manu Smriti in section IV Eight types of marriage (Verse 3.28)

ARSHA MARRIAGE

Arsha means Rishi or sage in Sanskrit and hence Arsha marriage suggests marriages with the sages or rishis. In this form of marriage the bride is given in exchange for two cows  received from  the groom.  Marriages  of  this  type used to  happen  because the parents of the bride couldn’t afford the expense of their daughter’s marriage at the right time according to the brahma rite. So the girl Is married off to an old sage.

However, this kind of marriage is not considered noble as there is give and take or business like transaction is involved.

In this marriage the father of bridegroom takes nothing and marriage is performed in holy yajna.

 PRAJAPATYA MARRIAGE

    Prajapatya is a Sanskrit word that is best known for referring to one of the eight types of marriage outlined in the ancient Hindu texts, the Vedas. In this tradition, marriage is a sacred and lifelong commitment between the husband and wife, and it is one of the samskaras.

    Prajapatya marriage was a marriage between a male and female ,who married after the groom’s family approach the bride’s family. Unlike the similar brahma marriage, in prajapatya marriage, the bride’s  father  gave the  bride away  to the  groom’s  father rather than the groom.

    Prajapatya marriage was most common when the bride and groom were very young, and as such the bride’s father handed his daughter to the groom’s father for protection during the panigrahan or hand-receiving ceremony. This ceremony was very important in the Vedic tradition.

Although the wedding ceremony itself may have taken place immediately after the hand-receiving ceremony, the wedding may have not been consummated for some years, if the bride and groom were very young.

ASURA MARRIAGE

    The Asura type of marriage Is one in which the bridegroom has to give money to the father or kinsman of the bride. The bridegroom decides the price according to  the position of the bride’s family  in society.  The main consideration  of  this  form  of marriage is money. The bride, In this form of marriage, is virtually purchased.

    In the Asura marriage, the groom is not at all suitable for the bride. He willingly gives as much wealth as he can afford, to  the  bride’s  parents  and  relatives.  It  could  be looked upon as bribe for getting the girl the boy desires even if he is in no way is a match for the girl. Therefore, the system of marriage is more or  less  like  buying  a product, which makes it undesirable in the present  time.  Generally  the  groom  is  of lower social rank or caste than the bride.

GANDHARVA MARRIAGE 

Out of the eight classical kinds of Hindu marriages,  a  Gandharva  marriage  is  purely based on love and passion. During the Rig Vedic times,  this  was  one  of  the  most popular forms of marriage in which mutual consent and freedom of  choice  were  of utmost importance. According to the Gandharva form of marriage, the boy and the girl can start living together once they find each other suitable without the need of anyone else’s consent, which also included  their  parents.  The  one  and  only  criterion  for carrying out this marriage was the couple’s likeness for each other.

The origin of Gandharva marriage began when the couple found mutual attraction in each other. The boy and the girl belonging to the same village used to meet at fair, temples, festivals and such other regular village everyday life events. That’s how they chose their partners and decided to spend  their  lives  together.  One  of  the  most famous and celebrated weddings in the epic era of Gandharva marriage was that of King Dushyanta and Shakuntala. In the Mahabharata, Bheem and Hadimba Devi were believed to have had married under  Gandharva  rituals.  In  Vaishnav  community  of certain parts of India, the couple gets married in a similar fashion, but in front of Lord Krishna’s idol.

 RAKSHASA MARRIAGE

     Rakshasa marriage is a type, in which the groom fights battles with the bride’s family, overcomes them and carries her away and then persuades her to marry. This is not considered as the right kind of marriage as this is forced marriage.

        This was a marriage by capture. Primitive  tribes  regarded  women  as  prizes  of  war, part of the plunder in a fair fight. This form was common in many other ancient civilization. It appealed to the warrior instinct of the Kshatriya, and was sometimes practised by them. Hindu scriptures describe this form  of  marriage  as  forcible abduction of a maiden from her home, while she cries and weeps, after her kinsmen have been slain or wounded and their  house  broken.  Women,  thus,  caused  many fights and battles in ancient times.

 PAISACHIKA MARRIAGE

         Paishacha marriage is the eighth and last  type  of  Hindu marriage.  It  is  considered as the most inferior type of marriage.  In this  type,  the girl’s  wish is  not  considered whether she wants to marry or not  instead  she  is  forced  to  marry  and  even  the bride’s family is not given anything in cash or kind. She is seized against her wish. And the marriage is done against the wish of the girl and her family. Men would marry a woman, whom he had seduced while she was asleep, intoxicated or insane. This kind of marriage was later prohibited.

    This was the worst form of all types of marriages. In this, the bride was abducted, but not in a fair fight with her tribe. She was molested or stolen, when she and her relatives were asleep, or in a state of intoxication during a tribal festival. This form universally condemned. The inclusion of this form of   marriage   in Hindu   Sutras   can only be justified on the ground that it was so prevalent among the primitive tribes that the Sutras could not have avoided its inclusion. By recognition of this form, the only advantage was that the children could be regarded as legitimate.


Written By:

D. Vasanthi, [2nd Year, BA.LLB(Hons.)] under the guidance of Dr. Nagalatha Bathina, Associate Professor, Vignan Institute of Law. 

Editorial Director:

Dr. Nagalatha Bathina, Associate Professor, Vignan Institute of Law. 

Editors:

Dr. Praveen Kumar, Director, Vignan Institute of Law

Mr. L. Ashish Kumar, Assistant Professor, Vignan Institute of Law

Blog Managed By:

Taj Mahamood Baig [2nd Year, BA.LLB(Hons.)]

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post