THE CONCEPT OF LOK ADALAT IN INDIA


        The concept of Lok Adalat (People’s Court) is an innovative Indian contribution to the world jurisprudence. The introduction of Lok Adalat’s added a new chapter to the justice dispensation system of this country and succeeded in providing a supplementary forum to the victims for a satisfactory settlement of their disputes. This system is based on Gandhian principles.

        It is one of the components of Alternative Dispute Resolution systems. In ancient times, the disputes were referred to “Panchayats”, which were established at the village level. Panchayats resolved the disputes through arbitration. It has proved to be a very effective alternative to litigation.

        This concept of the settlement of disputes through mediation, negotiation or arbitration is conceptualized and institutionalized in the philosophy of Lok Adalat. It involves people who are directly or indirectly affected by dispute resolution.

        This is the system, which has deep roots in Indian legal history and its close allegiance to the culture and perception of justice in Indian ethos. Experience has shown that it is one of the very efficient and important ADR mechanisms and most suited to the Indian environment, culture and societal interests.

Benefits of Lok Adalats

        Lok Adalats offer the parties speed of settlement and most cases are disposed of in a single day.

        There is no strict application of procedural laws such as the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. So the Lok Adalats are fast due to flexibility.

        The award issued by a Lok Adalat, after the filing of a joint compromise petition, has the status of a civil court decree. The award is binding.

        There is no court fee and if the court fee is already paid,  the amount will be refunded if the dispute is settled at Lok Adalat.

Amendments related to Lok Adalat in 2002

In 2002, the Parliament brought about certain amendments to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 to institutionalize the Lok Adalats by making them a permanent body to settle the disputes related to public utility services. The Central or State Authorities may, by notification, establish Permanent Lok Adalats at any Permanent Lok Adalats, for determining issues in connection to Public Utility Services.

Public Services include:

  1. Transport service
  2. Postal, telegraph or telephone services
  3. Supply of power, light and water to public
  4. System of public conservancy or sanitation
  5. Insurance services and such other services as notified by the Central or State Governments

        Permanent Lok Adalats have the same powers that are vested in the Lok Adalat

Consistution of Lokadalats

        The Lok Adalat is chairman, two members, and one social worker.

        The chairman must be a sitting or retired judicial officer.

        The other two members should be a lawyers.

Members

        The individuals determining the cases in the Lok Adalats are called the Members of the Lok Adalats

        They have the role of statutory intermediaries only

        They do not have any judicial role

Statutory

        Under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Lok Adalats have been given statutory status.

Final award

        Under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 the decision made by the Lok Adalats is considered to be a verdict of a civil court and is ultimate and binding on all parties.

No appeal

        There is no provision for an appeal against the verdict made by Lok Adalat

        If the parties are not satisfied with the award of the Lok Adalat though there is no provision for an appeal, they are free to initiate litigation.

No fee

        There is no court fee payable when a dispute is filed in a Lok Adalat.

        If a dispute pending in the court of law is referred to the Lok Adalat and is settled later, the court fee originally paid in the court on the petition is also reimbursed back to the parties.

Amicable Resolutions

        The Lok Adalat shall not decide the dispute so mentioned at its own instance, instead the same would be decided on the basis of the compromise between the parties.

        The members shall assist the parties in a sovereign and impartial manner in their attempt to reach a cordial settlement of their dispute.

Concerns

        In a majority of cases, litigants are pitted against entities with deep pockets, such as electricity boards, insurance companies, banks, etc.

         In most cases, compromises are imposed on the poor who often have no choice but to accept them.

        As compromise is its central idea, there is a concern that in the endeavour for speedy disposal of cases, it undermines the idea of justice.

        In State of Punjab vs Jalour Singh (2008), held that a Lok Adalat is purely conciliatory, and it has no adjudicatory or judicial function.

Conclusion

                The quest for equal, fair, and even-handed justice has been the passionate demand of human being from the emergence of the society in all civilisations. Therefore, the right of effective access to Justice has developed as the most basic human rights of a legal system which purports to guarantee the legal, social, political, cultural and economic rights in a country. The term access to Justice connotes the ability of a person to participate in the Judicial process for the protection and enforcement of his rights. It covers more than bare Court entry and includes the ability to reach the lawyers, police, enforcement machinery and capacity to bear the costs and time of litigation. In this backdrop, the right to access to Justice through efficacious Justice Delivery Mechanism, is imperative to secure Justice under the Constitution

The meaning of the term ‘Lok Adalat’ in literally is ‘People’s Court’ because the term comprises two words namely ‘Lok’ and ‘Adalat’, Lok stands for the people and Adalat means the Court. So, it is meant people’s Court. The former word of the term expressing the concept of public opinion while the latter devoting the accurate and thorough deliberation aspect of decision making. The Lok Adalat is an institution settles dispute by adopting the principles of Justice, equity and fair play. These noble principles are guiding factors for decisions of the Lok Adalats based on compromises to be arrived at before such Adalats. The Lok Adalat is a voluntary mechanism which is mainly concerned with two-fold functions – firstly, it provides a quick, easy, accessible, non-technical, sympathetic and disputant friendly forum to the people for resolution of their disputes and secondly, it helps overcome the hazard of the docket explosion.

The Lok Adalat System has the opportunity to live up to the goals of providing the public with an effective and informal dispute resolution mechanism as it had originally set out to accomplish. It can simultaneously relieve the burdens of the Formal Legal System and bring informal legal remedies to those that do not believe strongly in the Justice system. To achieve these objectives, Lok Adalats should take lessons from Alternative Dispute Resolution experiments abroad, along with lessons from Indian experiments, and adapt them to the culture and traditions of the rural Indian population.


Written By:

Haridasu Sahithi, [2nd Year, BBA.LLB(Hons.)] under the guidance of Dr. Nagalatha Bathina, Associate Professor, Vignan Institute of Law. 

Editorial Director:

Dr. Nagalatha Bathina, Associate Professor, Vignan Institute of Law. 

Editors:

Dr. Praveen Kumar, Director, Vignan Institute of Law

Mr. L. Ashish Kumar, Assistant Professor, Vignan Institute of Law

Blog Managed By:

Taj Mahamood Baig [2nd Year, BA.LLB(Hons.)]


 

 

 

 

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post